Re: Major GNU/Hurd using report
Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com> writes:
> KGI is quite portable (some parts needs to be non-preemptive, possible on Mach ?)
Why does it require that -- does it work on multiprocessors at
all?
> I'm not going to try compiling gnumach in *near* term.
> I had enough bad experience with Linux 2.3
> and am affraid of kernels since then.
Do you fear compiling it, or running the result?
> BTW : what about idea, that mach should save all booting messages
> into RAM and then redirect it to userspace ?
That would be good.
Reply to: