[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cd



On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann was heard to say:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 09:12:16PM -0500, Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
> > sh-2.02# cd ../lib
> > sh-2.02# pwd
> > //lib
> > ---------
> > Huh ?
> 
> By the way, I see the same behaviour under Linux glibc 2.1, so it is
> not a Hurd bug at all. Feel free to report this as a bug against the glibc
> package.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcus

  Is this a glibc problem?  A quick test with tcsh shows that it doesn't exhibit
the bug, but bash (/bin/sh on this system) does:
palantir:~> cd /
palantir:/> pwd
/
palantir:/> cd etc
palantir:/etc> pwd
/etc
palantir:/etc> cd ../lib
palantir:/lib> pwd
/lib
palantir:/lib> cd
palantir:~> sh
sh-2.02$ cd /
sh-2.02$ pwd
/
sh-2.02$ cd etc
sh-2.02$ pwd
/etc
sh-2.02$ cd ../lib
sh-2.02$ pwd
//lib

  ash also seems to be immune:
bluegreen:~> ash
$ cd /
$ pwd
/
$ cd etc
$ pwd
/etc
$ cd ../lib
$ pwd
/lib

  So I suspect a problem with bash.  Maybe I'm just confused though :)

  Daniel


Reply to: