Re: ld-2.9.1: REQ: better support for relative link script paths
> I'm not sure if we need all that hair.
Me either. That was my point.
> I assume you want it because you're aiming for a linker script that only
> contains:
>
> GROUP ( libc.so.6 libc_nonshared.a )
>
> but which automatically finds /lib/libc.so.6 and
> /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a. While this is neat, I don't think it is
> necessary.
I don't care what it looks like, but that is what it needs to do, yes.
> I would settle for writing the above script as:
>
> GROUP ( THISDIR/../../lib/libc.so.6 THISDIR/libc_nonshared.a )
>
> where THISDIR is shorthand for ``the directory which contains this
> linker script.''
Fine by me.
Reply to: