Re: debian hurd -- a little help?
>>>>> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
>> I am hoping that a single source package for glibc can be used to
>> build for either linux or hurd. Is this possible?
MB> Sure, but this is not as easy as it may sound. The current libc6
MB> maintainer is overworked, and someone has to change the Debian
MB> building scripts and remove linux specific things like
I've already made several of these changes, which have already been
merged into unstable/main/source/glibc-pre2.1_2.0.100-2.1.diff.gz.
You can cross-compile that package by doing:
debian/rules build arch=hurd-i386
I never finished the job, unfortunately, so the binary-arch rules are
probably wrong for the Hurd, but it should at least give you a
MB> So it will be faster to use "our" version of glibc for now. Other
MB> ports are building from 2.1 pre versions, this has to be
MB> investigated, too.
BTW, Marcus... your earlier concern about Linux using a different
dynamic linker than the Hurd has been resolved. As of the
glibc-pre2.1 Debian packages, even the i386 uses the ld.so that is
installed by glibc (since it now has all the functionality of the
I don't think it would be too hard to transition to glibc-2.1, and it
would definitely bring everybody back into sync.
Anyway, that's just my opinion, considering that I probably won't be
working on Hurd stuff except on weekends.
Gordon Matzigkeit <email@example.com> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)