Re: Request for better GnuMach/Hurd Information
Hi!
>>>>> James Taylor writes:
JT> I don't think packaging the gnu-0.2 release is at all worth
JT> packaging. However I don't think that is our aim. I thought it
JT> was clear that we will work with more recent snapshots which Gord
JT> will make available (am I missinterpreting your prior statements
JT> to this effect?).
I'm not the one making them available, I'm simply petitioning the
people with access to make regular (i.e. daily or weekly) snapshots.
I myself do not have access to the latest Hurd sources, because I
don't have the time to deal with AFS.
If anybody wants to help in this process, I think Brent's approach is
the right one: make your intentions known to bug-hurd@gnu.org, and
something should happen.
Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to do the work myself.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Copyright (C) 1998 FIG; the creator offers you this gift and wants it to
remain free. See http://www.fig.org/freedom.html for details.
This work is copylefted and may be copied, modified and distributed
under the GNU General Public License (GPL); it comes with absolutely
NO WARRANTY. See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: