[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#554574: libstdc++6: apt segfaults on hppa



On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:55:12PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> >
> > I confirm, it's what I see in the testsuite log:
> >
> > | 77
> > | __signbitl
> > | version status: incompatible
> > | GLIBCXX_3.4
> > | type: function
> > | status: added
> 
> If __signbitl is the only failure in the abi_check, then that's easy
> to fix, the testsuite needs to be updated.

For the testsuite part yes, but not the segfault :(

> With cloog/ppl disabled I still get 7 testsuite failures, so I'll have
> to dig into each failure tommorow and see what's wrong.
> 
> ~~~
> Running target unix
> FAIL: abi_check
> FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc (test for excess errors)
> UNRESOLVED: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc compilation failed to produce
> executable
> FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc (test for excess errors)
> UNRESOLVED: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc compilation failed to produce executable
> XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test
> for excess errors)
> FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/clear/1.c execution test
> FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit.c execution test
> FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_float.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_int.cc (test for excess errors)
> UNRESOLVED: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_int.cc compilation
> failed to produce executable
> 

Does the resulting binary works correctly with apt-get?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: