Re: Status update on NPTL
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 17:08 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Carlos O'Donell<carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Kyle McMartin<kyle@mcmartin.ca> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:17:14AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >>> I've been investigating the crashes, but because of problems with gdb
> >>> and strace I've had to take it slow. Kyle, I have your recent strace
> >>> patches in my queue to test. Thanks for that.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Which ones? It would be good if some heavy debugger users could test the
> >> changes in the tracehook branch with coredumps... I'll try to do a build
> >> of strace using PTRACE_{GET,SET}REGS instead of PEEK & POKE for extra
> >> testing there as well, but it seems to be working well enough for me.
> >
> > If I understand correctly you added PTRACE_GETREGS and PTRACE_SETREGS
> > with this patch:
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/1882
> >
> > Then you posted a patch to strace to use PTRACE_GETREGS and
> > PTRACE_SETREGS with this patch:
> > http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/10/752179/-What-staring-at-an-ass-really-looks-like
>
> Sorry, the corrected URL is this:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/1883
Don't apologise ... we're all intrigued by the interesting glimpse into
what you do in your other spare time ...
James
Reply to: