Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)
- To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 02:56:53 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020505065653.GA12097@nevyn.them.org>
- Mail-followup-to: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] m38z6z2igh.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- References: <[🔎] 15571.50195.280071.792305@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] m38z6z2igh.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:54:06AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
>
> > I would like to get feedback, on which alternative to base the gcc-3.1
> > packages:
> >
> > a) 3.1 as to be released (without dwarf2 support)
>
> As Redhat has demonstrated in the past, it is highly desirable that
> the distributed gcc is based on a released gcc as close as possible.
> If there are serious problems in gcc 3.1-as-released, work with gcc
> maintainers to fix them in 3.1.1.
Completely seconded. I want the collection of patches that
distributors ship with GCC to shrink over time, not grow...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: