[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#115218: Test binutils packages made...please test quickly



Rather than sending a patch (system is heavily loaded right now), just
uncomment the following lines in debian/scripts/dbs-build.mk (lines
15-17):

ifeq ($(ARCH),hppa)
debian_patches = $(filter-out 005_enable_combreloc.diff,$(all_patches))
endif

Right now, I've enabled -z combreloc by default, but was a bit worried
about hppa since I didn't know if the fixes had been done
yet.  Uncommenting those lines will restore default behaviour.

C


On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Grant Grundler wrote:

> Helge Deller wrote:
> > As far as I know this also happens with debian's actual qt-x11 package
> > (libqt2 ??).....Apparently he didn't got a deb-package,
> > so I assume he encountered the same problem.
> 
> It hadn't finished building by the time I went home.
> But the build isn't running now and I don't see a matching .deb in /usr/src.
> Output is on the xterm at work...I'll send that to christopher later.
>  
> 
> > Grant: Could you maybe make the tree available  to Christopher ?
> > I myself just have a slow dial-up connection and have to leave now until tomo
> >   rrow evening... :-(
> 
> Certainly. I'll get him a login on gsyprf11.
> 
> 
> BTW, apt didn't build.
> 
> ...
> Compiling deb/debversion.cc to ../build/obj/apt-pkg/debversion.opic
> Compiling deb/debsystem.cc to ../build/obj/apt-pkg/debsystem.opic
> Compiling deb/debindexfile.cc to ../build/obj/apt-pkg/debindexfile.opic
> Building shared library ../build/bin/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3.so.3.2.0
> collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped
> make[2]: *** [../build/bin/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3.so.3.2.0] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make: *** [build/build-stamp] Error 2
> grundler@gsyprf11:/usr/src/apt-0.5.4$ ld -v
> GNU ld version 2.11.92.0.5 20011005
> grundler@gsyprf11:/usr/src/apt-0.5.4$ 
> 
> So the idea to build something that uses c++ was a good one.
> I'm not going to try building mysql atm.
> 
> grant
> 
> 



Reply to: