Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?

To: Marek Ľach <mareklachbc@tutanota.com>, debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?
From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:58:51 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] Yel4q+aLtM9HwaQt@scru.org>
In-reply-to: <MtriHzX--B-2@tutanota.com>
References: <MtriHzX--B-2@tutanota.com>

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 02:42:13PM +0100, Marek Ľach wrote:
> I would like to ask if there're any foreseeable plans to possibly update the ghc to at least version 9.0.2 <https://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_9_0_2.html> for the testing Bookworm distribution?

My information may be out of date, but I believe that the
current blocker for GHC updates is a build failure on
mipsel:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ghc&suite=experimental

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?
  - From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>

Prev by Date: pandoc_2.9.2.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?
Previous by thread: pandoc_2.9.2.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread