Hi Dmitry, Quoting Dmitry Bogatov (2018-10-18 00:00:21) > Right now I try to move ghc-8.4 migration forward, and xmonad does not > build, since it depends on libghc-pandoc-dev. > > I remember, Jonas, you asked to not touch pandoc without coordination > with you, so how would we proceed? Thanks for involving me! In what ways do current Pandoc block migration of ghc? If a binNMU is not suitable, then is it possible to release the build-dependencies of Pandoc? If that was done already, then I simply missed that (and would appreciate a notification next time, or a pointer what I should watch out for). > And, by the way, why pandoc is not in DHG_packages? Thanks for asking :-) I understand how to maintain single packages but not how to "steer the fleet" of (re)building all Haskell packages at once - and don't have the computing power to do so either. Also, I like being able to maintain single packages: Feels more inclusive to me. I have similar concerns for the Rust team, who did a similar approach - the approach taken by the Perl team is more to my liking. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature