Re: Are pkg-haskell-tools, haskell-stack, haskell-cabal-install, cabal-debian meant to build in unstable?
Hi Joachim, All,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:07:13 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
[...]
> these do need updating. As they are binaries, and not libraries, they
> don’t break if dependencies upgrade (i.e. the binary package is still
> usable), and they fall off the radar somewhat, but this is definitely a
> RC bug.
>
Thanks a lot for the info! Just to check: shall I go ahead and file them?
Best,
Michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Are pkg-haskell-tools, haskell-stack, haskell-cabal-install, cabal-debian meant to build in unstable?
- Next by Date:
Re: Are pkg-haskell-tools, haskell-stack, haskell-cabal-install, cabal-debian meant to build in unstable?
- Previous by thread:
Re: Are pkg-haskell-tools, haskell-stack, haskell-cabal-install, cabal-debian meant to build in unstable?
- Next by thread:
Re: Are pkg-haskell-tools, haskell-stack, haskell-cabal-install, cabal-debian meant to build in unstable?
- Index(es):