Hi, Am Dienstag, den 10.05.2016, 22:57 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis: > sounds good to me. That said, Stackage currently doesn't provide > language-python[1], so I will go ahead and update it. yes, if a package is not on Stackage, then we just update it. But you should talk to upstream and suggest that it gets added to Stackage. > When I tried to rerun the package-plan today, it failed. At first, I > thought it was me doing something wrong, but then package-plan also > broke in Jenkins[2]. I couldn't understand why as there were no new > commits on package-plan. It turns out that the propellor[3] package > was > updated yesterday and it now uses the haskell-devscripts in order to > be built. This means that package-plan now recognizes the propellor > package as missing from the packages.txt file. As far as I can tell, > this is the first package maintained outside of DHG that uses the > haskell-devscripts. Do we add it to the packages.txt file? There are more; git-annex for example, and to some extend pandoc and agda (DHG is listed as the maintainer, but they have their code separately, and pandoc is usually only touched by Jonas). But yes: Add it to the package.txt. This way, we would notice if an upgrade by us would break propellor. Gruß, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part