Hi Sven, Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2015, 14:52 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > As you might have noticed, I just pushed a new commit to the > package-plan that contained a new file "lts-diff.hs". > > (Once compiled) it looks at packages.txt and lts.config and gives us > three lists of packages: > > - Packages that are in the LTS but not in Debian > - Packages that have a different versions in Debian and the LTS > - Packages that are in Debian but not the LTS nice! More tooling is good. > Packages that are in Debian but not the LTS aren't of that much > interest either, because those have to be marked as a key package (or be > a dependency of a key package) and if not the package plan will yell. I would say that is a interesting list. Ideally, all our packages are in LTS, so these are packages where we could try to convince upstream to join Stackage. > So the interesting thing is the list of packages that are in the LTS > but not in Debian. This way we have a list of packages we might want to > add to Debian. I’m not sure if that is really useful. I don’t think we have too few packages in Debian – if anything, we have too many. So I do not see any value in just adding „all of Stackage“. Or what is your intention here? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part