On 2015-07-01 17:08:24, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > * Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> [2015-06-28 10:29:23+0200] > > Hi, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2015, 05:26 +0300 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov: > > > * Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> [2015-06-15 20:38:25+0200] > > > > C. One big repo, haskell-foo’s debian/ files in haskell > > > > -foo/debian/ > > > > > > > > Having one repo has various advantages: > > > > [..] > > > > But there are also disadvantages: > > > > [..] > > > > > > Seems that most of us are prefering this variant. I am going to play > > > with it during next 48 hours. Is it something to base on around or > > > someone who already started hacking on it? > > > > I haven’t, if you want to give it a shot, that’d be great. I assume you > > are talking about converting the darcs repos to a git repository. > > Take a look in > > /var/lib/gforge/chroot/home/users/kaction-guest/bare-united > > What do you think? It was generated by attached script (takes several > hours and a lot of heat) Nitpick (feel free to ignore): > #!/bin/bash -eu I much prefer moving the -eu to from shebang 'set -eu', since that works even when someone calls the script via 'bash -x'. The shebang options take effect only when some calls the script directly, not via bash. thanks, iustin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature