Hello!
In continuation of dh-haskell migration, I stumped on another problem:
As I understand, we just mirror dev dependencies to doc, and such logic
I implemented in `dh-haskell`. But this example, ftphs, refuses to build
identically.
Here is libghc-ftphs-{dev,doc} relations:
$ apt-cache show libghc-ftphs-dev/experimental
[...]
Version: 1.0.9.1-5
Depends: libghc-missingh-dev-1.3.0.1-b8e3d, libghc-base-dev-4.8.1.0-4f720, libghc-hslogger-dev-1.2.9-c3626, libghc-mtl-dev-2.2.1-5cf33, libghc-network-dev-2.6.2.1-aa38f, libghc-parsec-dev-3.1.9-5921a, libghc-regex-compat-dev-0.95.1-6ce23, libc6 (>= 2.2.5)
[...]
$ apt-cache show libghc-ftphs-doc/experimental
[...]
Version: 1.0.9.1-5
[...]
Recommends: ghc-doc, libghc-hslogger-doc, libghc-missingh-doc
[...]
Doc package does not recommentd libghc-mtl-doc, but dev depends on
libghc-mtl-dev. Why is it happening? Is it correct?
--
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en,ru
X-Keep-In-CC: yes
X-Web-Site: nanlnhhunqer4xcy.onion
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature