[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [pkg-haskell-tools] 01/01: Fixed bug that caused builds to fail under certain conditions outlined below. Let's consider three haskell source packages: <A>, <B> and <C>. <A> build-depends on a library package built by <B>, called <B.a>. <B.a> (runtime-)depends on an executable package built by C, called <C.b>. Neither A nor B build-depend on packages built by C. When <A> is built, it is possible that <C> is not built yet, thus <B.a> fails to install, failing the build of <A>.



Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2015, 20:59 +0000 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> commit f2bcce12244b66e93410574545cdbad3ebe810af
> Author: Sven Bartscher <sven.bartscher@weltraumschlangen.de>
> Date:   Thu Aug 20 22:47:13 2015 +0200
> 
>     Fixed bug that caused builds to fail under certain conditions outlined
>     below.
>     Let's consider three haskell source packages: ,  and .
>      build-depends on a library package built by , called .
>      (runtime-)depends on an executable package built by C, called .
>     Neither A nor B build-depend on packages built by C.
>     When  is built, it is possible that  is not built yet, thus
>      fails to install, failing the build of .

quite right that this is a shortcoming of the system. I tried to make
it take binary dependencies into account, but then I noticed that I
would have to handle Provided/Depends, and reverted. I did not think of
this particular problem with non-library dependencies, so the variant
that only works with non-libraries is still useful, thanks!

I take it that this was the cause for Alexandre’s hspec problem?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: