Hi, Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2015, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop: > Given the recent discussions on d-devel about tag/commit signing in Git, > I looked a bit to see if Darcs supports anything like this. I was > surprised to learn that Darcs only supports signing for a completely > different purpose (patch transport), and no way to verify history. > > Do I misunderstand the situation with Darcs? If not, are we bothered by > this deficiency in Darcs, and could we do something about it? I don't > know much about the Darcs model and whether it makes sense to 'sign' a > darcs tag, therefore I'm asking. looks like it is not supported: http://darcs.net/FAQ#how-do-i-sign-and-verify-darcs-repositories But I don’t expect that our Darcs setup will survive DebCamp anyways, the complaints about it are just too numerous. It is mostly a matter of deciding the right repo setup/workflow for us. (I’m quite sure it is not one git-buildpackage-like repository for every package.) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part