[ What follows was witnessed from a distance, this might be incorrect. ] Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> (2014-08-22): > we all know that Haskell packages tend to become uninstallable in > unstable, but until now I thought that britney will ensure that > installable packages in testing stay installable. […] > Any idea how this might have happened? Maybe autoremovals? But I don’t > see an autoremoval of, say, hint. While working on getting Perl into shape it was noticed some packages were becoming uninstallable, while they were not. This led to a bug fix about uninstallability computation. I suspect the opposite might have been true (consdering packages installable while they were becoming uninstallable). http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=mirror/britney2.git;a=commitdiff;h=ef456597971acacc9c38c48e49ca7829614f5440 I don't know britney enough to be sure so I can only guess the above. Hopefully someone with more expertise (Adam, Niels?) will confirm/infirm as appropriate. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature