Hi, Am Montag, den 16.06.2014, 23:19 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:16PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Hi Joachim, > > > when you say FTBFS, you really mean that their build-dependencies are > > > not installable, not that the build is attempted and fails (which would > > > be bad), right? > > > > Yes, sorry, it's generally all about build dependencies. Nevertheless I found > > the large number of those somewhat alarming. > > This is commonplace when something deep in the stack changes to expose a > different ABI version string; Joachim typically schedules binNMUs in > such cases and these clear out eventually. correct. This is not automated, and sometimes I’m not aware that I have to check. I scheduled a large bunch of binNMUs yesterday, so the situation should improve. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part