Hi, Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > For Haskell _libraries_ I agree. But not for anything Haskell-based. > > Package section is labelled "Haskell programming language and libraries" > - implementations of Haskell and libraries to extend it belong there. > > Packages like gitit, hledger and pandoc-citeproc do not belong in > haskell section. Probably same (judging from their descriptions) for > arbtt, hbro, hopenpgp-tools, hsbrainfuck, mighttpd2, shelltestrunner, > taffybar, unlambda, x509-util. > > Package categories are about purpose, not implementation style. Haskell > is not the only package section with plenty of wrongly categorized > packages... I absolutely agree! Sounds like some low-hanging fruit for our new contributors: Change the section and make your way into the changelogs :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part