Dear Jur, Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2014, 16:26 +0200 schrieb Jurriaan Hage: > with Helium on Hackage, I am not sure whether it would make sense > to include it in Debian again, but I guess in the state it is now in, > it could be included. It seems stable enough (although I did spot some > small errors in the .cabal files). if you think so then that’s certainly a reason to reconsider: Having an active upstream is always a big plus! I’ll look into it the next days. The previous package used to have a manpage¹, it would be nice if the new one would ship and maintain it properly, i.e. in the hackage tarball Also there were a few patches against the old package: http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/old/helium/patches/ I guess most (all?) of them are not needed any more with Cabal building the program. Greetings, Joachim ¹ http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/old/helium/helium.1 http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/old/helium/texthint.1 http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/old/helium/lvmrun.1 -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part