Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?

To: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Cc: debian-haskell <debian-haskell@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
From: David Fox <ddssff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:54:29 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] CAJN_RF5_vETO8fnhMLQ3teXa8oHzd4Ujw726_b_w47ehqYdBfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20131004041852.GA18339@scru.org>
References: <521FDC26.7060908@gmail.com> <20130830053007.GB7612@scru.org> <CAJN_RF7yj5hsGjeM7S3KQASxU0f8HJ3-RehFYvEqvMZeZRgpmA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20131004041852.GA18339@scru.org>

process-listlike is a fork of process-extras which adds the functions readCreateProcess and readCreateProcessWithExitCode. Because you pass in a CreateProcess, you can set the working directory of the process you are creating. I now see that I don't use that function in debian, I could try to make it build with either.

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:06:30AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> I stand ready to make changes to cabal-debian on request.

Is there some reason debian switched to process-listlike?
With System.Process.ByteString.Lazy from process-extras,
3.79.1 seems to build.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
  - From: David Fox <ddssff@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
  - From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: lambdabot testing
Next by Date: Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
Previous by thread: Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
Next by thread: Re: State of the art for debianizing Haskell packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread