Hi Kiwamu, Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 20:52 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2012, 11:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > >> What do you think of that approach? > > > > well let’s try. I uploaded ghc-7.6 to experimental, along with an > > updated haskell-devscripts (with a ghc >= 7.6 bound) and, as a test > > package, haskell-transformers (with a bound on haskell-devscripts). This > > should make the autobuilder build everything with only packages from > > experimental. > > It's good approach for me. > > But I have a question. > Which darcs repo should I use to release experimental package? > > http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/xxxxx/ > http://anonscm.debian.org/darcs/pkg-haskell/experimental/xxxxx/ For the recent uploads to experimental, I have used the regular repo, as I don’t expect changes to the unstable package any more. I suggest you do the same and do not bother about the repos in experimental/. (For ghc I did use the experimental/ repo, but only because it did already exist before.) Greetings, Joachim PS: No need to mail to me personally, just write to d-haskell, I am reading the list. -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part