Hi, Am Dienstag, den 03.04.2012, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:49:04PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > Accepted: > > […] > > darcs_2.7.99.1-1_amd64.deb > > to main/d/darcs/darcs_2.7.99.1-1_amd64.deb > > I uploaded the new Darcs RC to experimental, but I'm now wondering if we > shouldn't just put it in unstable directly? I've been using it for a bit > and it seems pretty stable, and importantly it doesn't FTBFS (or have > broken filename encoding handling if monkey-patched). > > Upstream aims to have 2.8 out in May, which would be in time for our > freeze. > > WDYT? Perhaps the rest of you could give this version a go for a few > days and if all cats/children remain unharmed then upload to unstable? first I’d like to see some clarity about the effect of the filename encoding problems: Do they affect all repos with non-ASCII-Filenames? Or just repositories with filenames not representable in the current locale? Depending on the severity, we might want to put a notice into a NEWS.Debian file, and/or have Darcs warn the user when it comes across a problematic filename (if it is not doing that already). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part