Re: Comments regarding haskell-monads-tf_0.1.0.0-1_amd64.changes
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, David Fox <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Clint Adams <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:10:32PM +0000, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>>> I'm not sure who the intended users of this package might be, so I can't
>>> if they'll understand your package description. But at least have no idea
>>> what "Monad classes using type families, with instances for various monad
>>> transformers, inspired by the paper [..]" is trying to tell me, so please
>>> consider improving your package description.
>> Would anyone care to suggest better wording?
> I would start with "Drop-in replacement for mtl implemented using type
> classes, which has the advantage of..."
Sorry, type families...