On 12-03-11 at 10:34am, John MacFarlane wrote: > +++ Jonas Smedegaard [Mar 11 12 14:13 ]: > > On 12-03-10 at 06:30pm, John MacFarlane wrote: > > > +++ Jonas Smedegaard [Feb 29 12 10:58 ]: > > > > On 12-02-29 at 01:41pm, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > > > > > Lualatex has error. > > > > > > > > > > $ cat hoge.md > > > > > # Title > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > * Item1 > > > > > * Item2 > > > > > $ /usr/bin/pandoc hoge.md --latex-engine=pdflatex -f markdown -o hoge.pdf > > > > > $ /usr/bin/pandoc hoge.md --latex-engine=xelatex -f markdown -o hoge.pdf > > > > > $ /usr/bin/pandoc hoge.md --latex-engine=lualatex -f markdown -o hoge.pdf > > > > > pandoc: Error producing PDF from TeX source. > > > > > ! > > > > > ******************************************** > > > > > * XeTeX is required to compile this document. > > > > > * Sorry! > > > > > ********************************************. > > > > > \RequireXeTeX ...********************************} > > > > > \endgroup \fi > > > > > l.18 \RequireXeTeX > > > > > > > > > > But I can't the reason of the TeX error.... > > > > > > > > Hmm, yes - looks odd (and contrary to upstream documentation!) that > > > > LuaTeX should require XeTeX (and even parts of XeTeX that XeLaTeX > > > > does not need itself). > > > > > > > > @John: Could you help here, how to proceed debugging? > > > > > > I don't get the error on my system, but I do have xetex installed. > > > First step in debugging would be > > > > > > /usr/bin/pandoc hoge.md -s -t latex -o hoge.tex > > > > > > then run lualatex directly > > > > > > lualatex hoge.tex > > > > > > and inspect the log for further messages. > > > > > > The error message seems to be coming from the ifxetex.sty package, > > > which defines \RequireXeTeX. I ran lualatex on hoge.tex and inspected > > > the list of packages it opened, then grepped through all of them for > > > \RequireXeTeX. The only hit was in ifxetex.sty. So that is no help. > > > > > > It is possible that the issue you're seeing is cleared up in TeXLive > > > 2011, or maybe in the transition from pandoc 1.9.1.1 to 1.9.1.2. > > > Sorry I can't be more help at the moment. > > > > Seems you are right, John - apparently fontspec supports LuaTeX only > > since TeXLive 2010: > > latex-alive.tumblr.com/post/643148677/fontspec-for-luatex > > > > Anyone have a suggestion how to improve the TeX template to require > > fontspec 2.0 when used with LuaTex, and else do some sort of fallback? > > Why is debian so far behind on TeXLive? That seems the obvious place > to improve matters. I guess because TeXLive is huge, and Debian here - as is sometimes the case - does more than simply shrinkwrap upstream releases. Apparently there was quite recently a first release of TeXLive 2011 to experimental: http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/texlive-base.html Changelog entry for the packaging release is quite terse, yet telling: * new upstream, too many changes I would apprecieate if Pandoc could somehow gracefully deal with TeXLive 2009, as I would love for the package to be backportable to current stable Debian (and other distros as well), and also to not need to strictly rely on TeXLive 2011 packaging maturing in time for the freeze of upcoming stable Debian distro release. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature