[Taking d-admin out of the loop, as you don’t seem to be talking about a DSA managed machine.] Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.02.2012, 23:29 +0200 schrieb Riku Voipio: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 07:46:18PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Things would be easier for everyone if the GHC HEAD would be > > automatically and regularly built on an arm machine. They do have an > > infrastructure for automated builds². > > Is it acceptable use of a Debian machine to do so – after all it will > > automatically download (SSL-verified) and run code? > > And is there a machine that I could use for that? > > Does it need to be debian.org machine? No, just anything running Debian is fine :-) > I'm sure we can get you > an dedicated ARM machine for continous haskell building. For example an > efika mx (if speed is not that important) or pandaboard. Taking an armv7 > machine would allow you to run both armel and armhf builds on the same machine. Speed is helpful, but RAM and disk are more important, as you can see here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&arch=armel Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part