Hi, Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2011, 00:11 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe: > > Kiwamu, have you notified Jasper Van der Jeugt that his package needs an > > update? Once that has happened, you can upload hakyll to unstable. > > No, I have not notified. > > I would like to understand why hakyll debian package is broken. > Then I say "Where is haskell-hakyll's source repository?" > I had heard him first. > > I didn't know pandoc-type problem. > But do we have the hamlet depend on probrem yet? > If so, I will try to fix it or ask Jasper. Hakyll depends on hamlet <0.9. When hakyll was first uploaded to Debian, this was the version of hamlet in Debian and the package built fine. By now, hamlet has been upgraded to 0.10, so hakyll will no longer build. I suggest you test locally if the latest version of hakyll builds against hamlet-0.10 if you change the cabal file of hakyll to allow that. If it does not not build, you can, if you want, try to make it work. Then report the findings, possibly with a patch, to Jasper. He’ll then do a new hakyll release on hackage which we can include in Debian. The fact that pandoc does not provided a hash-based name is a minor issue that ought to be fixed, but should not stop us from working towards a hamlet-0.10-compatible version of hakyll in Debian. I’m still not sure if there is really is a problem with pandoc-types and hakyll. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part