[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Heading for unstable


On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:00:16PM +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 09:38 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sáb Mar 26 04:18:38 -0300 2011:
> So are we ready to go to unstable now?

I believe so.

I put haskell-devscripts 0.8.2 in unstable, and building ghc right now.
Not sure how far I’ll get with the libraries.

Anyways, stuff will get stuck in NEW because of the renaming.

If you upload the libraries, you might want to bump the
haskell-devscripts dependency to >= 0.8, just for clarity.

FYI. I filed [0] about the FTBFS I mailed about earlier in the week,
since nobody replied. I figured that since it was a compiler bug in
OCaml to generate invalid c/asm, then it's probably one in GHC
too. We'll see what upstream says, but just be aware when you see
these build failures.

Did you ask the release team for approval for this transition?


[0] http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5050

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: