Re: RFH: ghc
Kari Pahula wrote:
> So I suppose this is an RFH message.
/me raises hand
> I can still stick around as a
> comaintainer but it's a bit too much for myself alone. What's the
> Haskell team's preferred VCS? I prefer darcs myself but I suppose git
> is good too.
I prefer darcs over git.
> I suppose uploading GHC 7 to unstable is fine already since it won't
> replace ghc6 packages due to renaming it to ghc. Just add a ghc6
> pseudopackage after the release.
Sounds reasonable.
> I haven't yet tried building the new GHC or even had a good look at
> it.
Is there already repo for the ghc6 packaging? Should we maybe branch
it for experimenting with ghc 7?
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Reply to: