Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.09.2010, 10:45 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Hi Joachim. > > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Set 09 10:30:32 -0300 2010: > (...) > > Implement such changes in experimental, or wait for after the release (or at > > least until it is unlikely that we are changing squeeze through unstable) and > > then do the stuff in unstable? > > Well, sounds like the same to me from the release perspective. Am I missing > something? It the question: Bother with experimental (and thus two versions to care about, wondering how we best handle that with the darcs repos)? Or wait (and fix RC bugs in the meanwhile :-)). I’m not too fond of using experimental and would not mind waiting, but I don’t want to hold anyone back. I guess we need a directory darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/experimental for the experimental branches then. I’m not sure how PET can handle that. Probably easiest to just run a a second PET instance, only seeing the repos in experimental. @pet-devel: Is PET set up to track two branches of one package in the VCS? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part