Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 08:28 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Excerpts from Ketil Malde's message of Qui Jun 03 02:46:36 -0300 2010: > > Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> writes: > > > > > Judging from Simons comment¹ to the bug, inclusion will take longer than > > > we want to wait. So we’ll have to add the process-leksah package to > > > Debian temporarily. We should make it clear in the description that > > > people should not use it for anything but building leksah. > > > > Uh, if process-leksah isn't useful for anything but building leksah, and > > leksah isn't working without process-leksah, shouldn't process-leksah > > just be bundled with leksah, that is, in the same .deb? > > No, because it's used to build leksah, not to use leksah. Maybe what you want > to say is to include it in the leksah source package, which doesn't seem to be > a bad option. The build scripts would have to be adjusted, but from my point of > view this is the best option so far. With the new source format we can have > more than one .tar.gz. Joachim, what's your opinion on this? if it is easily possible, that would be great. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part