Dear Takaki, I see you plan to upload a large number of additional haskell modules. This is great! To keep things in one place, I’d prefer if these were maintained in the same manner as the other packages, e.g. with darcs repository as described on http://wiki.debian.org/Haskell/CollabMaint/DarcsBasic the tagging process described on http://wiki.debian.org/Haskell/CollabMaint/Processes The benefit is, for example, that they will appear on http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi and that bulk work affecting all package (such as the pending package renames when ghc7 comes) is easier. I see you upload your packages already with the DHG as the maintainer. Is there a reason why you do not use the darcs repositories? I’m also not sure if you follow the discussions on d-haskell, as I hardy hear from you. Do you? If there are any reasons why you do not use the DHG resources, please tell us about them, there is always room for improvement. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part