[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: doc-base

[This time to the list]


Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 13:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> I noticed that hstringtemplate includes a doc-base file for the HTML haddock
> documentation.  Should we do this in all packages and include it in the
> PackageTemplate?

I’m not sure. I, as a user, never used doc-base. Also, the haddock
libraries are linked in a probably more useful way from 
Maybe only that should have a doc-base entry, and single modules should

IIRC some few libraries have real, non-API documentation. These can of
course have a doc-base entry of their own.

But if we chose to add doc-base files to all libraries, we should, if
possible, do it via haskell-devscripts.

Is anyone here using the doc-base indexes and can comment on the
usefulness of this?


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: