[This time to the list] Hi, Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 13:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > I noticed that hstringtemplate includes a doc-base file for the HTML haddock > documentation. Should we do this in all packages and include it in the > PackageTemplate? I’m not sure. I, as a user, never used doc-base. Also, the haddock libraries are linked in a probably more useful way from file:///usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/index.html Maybe only that should have a doc-base entry, and single modules should not? IIRC some few libraries have real, non-API documentation. These can of course have a doc-base entry of their own. But if we chose to add doc-base files to all libraries, we should, if possible, do it via haskell-devscripts. Is anyone here using the doc-base indexes and can comment on the usefulness of this? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part