Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Mar 25 14:27:16 -0300 2010:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 13:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> > I noticed that hstringtemplate includes a doc-base file for the HTML haddock
> > documentation. Should we do this in all packages and include it in the
> > PackageTemplate?
> I’m not sure. I, as a user, never used doc-base.
> Also, the haddock libraries are linked in a probably more useful way from
> Maybe only that should have a doc-base entry, and single modules should
> IIRC some few libraries have real, non-API documentation. These can of
> course have a doc-base entry of their own.
This is a good point. Does anyone think it's useful also for libraries to
provide doc-base links?
I'm CCing the doc-base maintainer. Robert, what do you think about this
> But if we chose to add doc-base files to all libraries, we should, if
> possible, do it via haskell-devscripts.
- From: Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: doc-base
- From: Joachim Breitner <email@example.com>