[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hashed-storage vs. mmap



Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 13:37 +1100 schrieb Trent W. Buck:
> I spoke to Petr about it.  At the time, there weren't any versions of
> hashed-storage that worked with mmap-0.5, but he wrote and tested a
> trivial patch (below) which passes hashed-storage's regression tests.
> 
> I guess you just quilt import this into an h-s 0.3.9 debian/.  Darcs
> 2.3.1 also has a 0.4 ceiling for mmap (an optional build-dep), but I'm
> told I can just bump this.

Thanks for clearing this up. I applied the patch and uploaded the
package.

> Note that darcs 2.4rc2 depends on hashed-storage >= 0.4.7 && < 0.5, and
> 2.4 is due for release in weeks (days?), so I haven't been worrying too
> much about Darcs 2.3.1 and h-s 0.3.9.

True, one could wait. But the patch is little effort and I’d like to see
the Haskell libs in a release state as soon as possible.

> I'm sorry I'm not making much time to help with Darcs' deps.  When I
> adopted Darcs it had simpler deps and I just assumed someone else would
> take care of them.

That’s ok, that’s why we have the team :-)

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Reply to: