Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva ha scritto: > I reviewed my opinion from the last time we discussed this, and I'm not > a radical for darcs: I'd be happy to work with Git too. OTOH, pet[0] > works for darcs and there're 86 dirs in /darcs/pkg-haskell against 12 > in /git/pkg-haskell. So, because of these points I think it would be > more practical to change them all to darcs. Personally, I prefer git over darcs, because I find it more flexible and with more useful features. I'm using darcs just because Joachim asked me so: it's not bad, but I miss some of the things I was used to. Anyway, it is surely good to have all the packages under the same VCS: maybe it's better to switch to darcs, otherwise the work would be much greater (and, of course, there is also the PET issue). Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature