Re: haxml needs work
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> You should not put two UNRELEASED changelog entries on top of each
> other, I’d say. If you based your changes on the version in the archive,
> then you should remove the other UNRELEASED entry, if not, you should
> mention all changes in “your” entry. Which one does apply here?
Mine is mostly derived from the 1.17-6 version so I just dumped the
older UNRELEASED section.
> I always thought that debhelper dependency and debian/compat number
> should match. Is there a reason not to use compat 7? What’s the reason
> for the (>= 7.2.3) dependency?
Fixed with compat 7 and debhelper (>=7).
> No build-dependency on haskell-devscripts. Did you try it in a
> cowbuilder?
Fixed. Whats in darcs now builds under pbuilder.
> I’ve stopped using Build-Depends-Indep.
Moved those to Build-Depends.
> The Depends, Suggests, and Recommends are now mostly handled by
> haskell-devscripts. Check
> http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/haskell-zip-archive/control to see
> which ones are available for which package.
I followed your example there, but I get:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${haskell:Depends}
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${haskell:Suggests}
Do i need a specific version of haskell-devscripts?
> debian/haxml-doc.docs lists LICENCE files. These should not be
> installed, as they are in /usr/share/common-licenses and referenced from
> debian/copyright.
Fixed.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Reply to: