Re: Error building package

[trentbuck@gmail.com (Trent W. Buck)]

Magnus,

Magnus Therning <magnus@therning.org> writes:
> I'd recommend starting over, using hlibrary.mk instead.  Here's a
> shameless plug for my own blog post:
> http://therning.org/magnus/archives/458

For my (non-Haskell library) packages, I have switched from using CDBS
to dh(1), a new feature in debhelper (>= 7).  In general I have found
dh(1) makefiles easier to maintain because they have fewer "magic
variables".

Have you found time to look into the viability of using dh(1) for
Haskell libraries?  If so, and you decided against it, would you please
outline the reasons?