Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has the group considered group maintainership of haskell related
> packages? This would mean that all packages maintained by the
> group would be maintained in a central repository (the Ocaml
> people are in the process of transitioning from svn to git) and
> if needed, allow anyone in the group to step in and fix a packaging
> problem.
>
> Having been involved a little with the debian-ocaml-maintainers
> group I found that the group maintainership approach worked very
> will for them. IMO it also lowered the barrier of entry for newcomers
> to join in and contribute.
>
> Opinions?
As a non-DD I especially like the last point :-)
Is the OCaml DDs pooling their resources on all OCaml-related packages,
or is there a defined subset that is maintained by the group?
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
Haskell is an even 'redder' pill than Lisp or Scheme.
-- PaulPotts
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature