Re: [Fwd: ITP: libghc6-extensible-exceptions -- Extensible exceptions for the Glasgow Haskell Compiler]
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 22:23 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
>> I'm not very convinced. I'm not trying to convince about the other
>> side, but just to learn: why is it bad to have a silly haskell package
>> high in the dependency tree?
> Because a new release of extensible-exceptions will require re-builds of
> all depending packages (and their depending packages)...
Speaking of this, that process is a complete PITA. Does anybody have
any automation to make it happen?