Bug#1016847: marked as done (tucnak: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2022 03:34:38 +0000
with message-id <E1oR3de-00DpKF-To@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1016847: fixed in tucnak 4.36-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016847,
regarding tucnak: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1016847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tucnak
Source-Version: 4.34-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch
Hi!
This package has a dependency on telnet (which denotes either a specific
implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the
generic telnet-client, which denotes any implementation.
Please change it to: telnet | telnet-client.
This was prompted while evaluating how to switch the current telnet
implementation in Debian, which is now in progress, although this is
not a blocker, as inetutils will provide telnet.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tucnak
Source-Version: 4.36-1
Done: tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tucnak, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1016847@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> (supplier of updated tucnak package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:09:59 -0700
Source: tucnak
Architecture: source
Version: 4.36-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Closes: 1016847
Changes:
tucnak (4.36-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
* New upstream version 4.36
* Depend on the generic telnet-client (Closes: #1016847)
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1
* Freshen years in debian/copyright
Checksums-Sha1:
f3f9a2c580db51c574053a8f523a3e42803ac6eb 2159 tucnak_4.36-1.dsc
affce7e23b8f99b13c31e6b695abe58688861921 3601081 tucnak_4.36.orig.tar.gz
c9d789b1e365335ff757dd7d4a748a5f1df408be 5928 tucnak_4.36-1.debian.tar.xz
d254f7f6586bd307045c5bfaf64bc466e2eab8b4 16142 tucnak_4.36-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
84c3a7749b383f212549287c4654c6547c5709d379ae0f825ec31efffbb845ca 2159 tucnak_4.36-1.dsc
655752873c5509fae08827997c9f14d1671efe049a2693053091c4ac11f21f29 3601081 tucnak_4.36.orig.tar.gz
7263bb5be0e6b0635dc7189b20ed7f0d6c2fb185146eafc16b8dc8df82771722 5928 tucnak_4.36-1.debian.tar.xz
9c19f84d320de48e8411be8cd0fbee013b50deb32c569270b24e00947dd616e8 16142 tucnak_4.36-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
ade8b0d7b14f377385844158cbf8d658 2159 hamradio optional tucnak_4.36-1.dsc
10b05bf619375e4433cbcd370a3b107f 3601081 hamradio optional tucnak_4.36.orig.tar.gz
e700c1a57adc4945f5c2fcefd8074771 5928 hamradio optional tucnak_4.36-1.debian.tar.xz
00db78378d5072f368ab7eb75ae1e385 16142 hamradio optional tucnak_4.36-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=FMaa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: