Hi Patrick, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:20:44PM -0400, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > If the bug was severe problem, I hope it would have been well communicated > once discovered. I think this was complicated by the upstream maintainer being unresponsive. > You don't seem to know how the BTS works for sending developer bug reports. > Developers get pretty much all the new bug reports for all the packages (or at > least it seems that way). Yep, I mean that debbugs itself should have copied you. > Copying a developer directly when sending messages about their package to a > list is not "hiding anything" or obscuring the conversation. It is a courtesy. > I did not hide anything, I posted my opinions to the list even before responding > to you *and* the list. That thread went off-topic. When that happened, you're correct, I should have added you or the bug to CC. Apologies for not doing that. > I filed a request with the FHS group a long time ago for this consideration. > Nice to hear it is not lost in the ether. All I ever got on the FHS front > was a very delayed ack the request was received. Ok. Me and Dave MM3ZRZ will follow up with FHS and keep you informed of any progress we have. Thanks, Iain. -- e: irl@fsfe.org w: iain.learmonth.me x: irl@jabber.fsfe.org t: EPVPN 2105 c: 2M0STB g: IO87we p: 1F72 607C 5FF2 CCD5 3F01 600D 56FF 9EA4 E984 6C49
Attachment:
pgpWQlVzKN77R.pgp
Description: PGP signature