Re: work on d-star clone?

[jarvis@jarviscomputer.com]

Tnx for the replies.   I appreciate the information.   It has been
reported on the 14567.org that the vodec is not used on the pure data
mode.   Is that true?

73 Clare
de K0NY





>  > I've not seen anything on D-STAR except ICOM gear.  While the protocol
>  > is open, I understand that the vocoder chip ICOM uses is a proprietary
>  > off the shelf item.  While the chips may be available to the
>  > experimenter, I've read of concerns of there not being a second source
>  > for the chips.
>
> There are worse concerns than that.  Overloading identification data
> (needed for regulatory reasons) for routing purposes, extremely limited
> callsigns (if you're an Aussie with a four letter callsign suffix, no
> D-Star for you...), one radio per callsign (can you say lots of
> technically illicit club calls under US regs?), network size limitations
> that could hail from the 70s, the undocumented nature of the supporting
> protocol for internet linking and services, no software codecs without
> NDA and $kilobucks, etc.  PLEASE WILL THE RF FOLKS GET SOME HELP FROM
> THE DIGITAL FOLKS WHEN DESIGNING THIS STUFF?
>
> High speed data ain't == D-Star, and I personally hope something
> sensible comes along.
>
> KB8ZQZ
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hams-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>