[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#308402: marked as done (missing dependency)



Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
with message-id <E1DVLwZ-0000ko-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#308402: fixed in node 0.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 01:17:55 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon May 09 18:17:55 2005
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DVJNj-0008EN-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 18:17:55 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
	by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
	id 1DVJPn-0001HX-Mu
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:20:03 +0200
Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
	id 1DVJQd-0007D6-0d
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:20:55 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DVJNC-0007M0-74
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:17:22 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: missing dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:17:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DVJNC-0007M0-74@feynman.djpig.de>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: node
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error:
Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing node (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 node
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
	Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308402-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 04:13:20 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon May 09 21:13:20 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DVM7U-0001CD-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 21:13:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DVLwZ-0000ko-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
To: 308402-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308402: fixed in node 0.3.2-4
Message-Id: <E1DVLwZ-0000ko-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
Delivered-To: 308402-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: node
Source-Version: 0.3.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

node_0.3.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4.diff.gz
node_0.3.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4.dsc
node_0.3.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 308402@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> (supplier of updated node package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:25:33 +1000
Source: node
Binary: node
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Description: 
 node       - Amateur Packet Radio Node program
Closes: 308402
Changes: 
 node (0.3.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added runtime dependency on netbase which provides
     update-inetd (closes: #308402)
Files: 
 3ebd80d670fbfa3f3f67965dc9b3251c 937 hamradio optional node_0.3.2-4.dsc
 11b49d63941ee518c31b086aa6e36bcf 4631 hamradio optional node_0.3.2-4.diff.gz
 57677473af4a86240bc0b9be45706354 51558 hamradio optional node_0.3.2-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQoAskNiYIdPvprnVAQJafwQAja3PgND/VKotO42kLHCHRa7TOHAFrkDr
v4Vh5aUn8we+OU2/YWVz3hBq0cgRiXGVPLcdEvwOg1a+9Gi+yzWKogpH6QR+1dKC
ZdkLj5oembhzdri6M+Hn/uIetYBxrtx2KvAICreJUgoe2ZcJNplFT3yBmU3U/djY
toE0FzPQfg8=
=2XdX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: