[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nec antenna modeling




On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Erik Jakobsen wrote:

> kg6kqt@speakeasy.net skrev:
> >I've been working to bring my dad from windows to linux for a while and at this point it seems to be an ostrich problem (he knows windows, he likes windows, and  thinks everyone who's anyone uses windows and only windows to do real work.  Since Linux can't run windows programs and software and has no substantial software of it's own it of course then can't be relied upon to do any real work  Yes this is FUD and lies but he doesn't know any better...he has his head stuck in the sand - like an ostrich!)
> >
> >Basicly here's where I turn to the debian-hams list for help.
> >
> >I've covered the basic email, web, and office apps...now he's given me a challenge - he wants to do antenna modeling and use something similar to what http://www.nittany-scientific.com/ sells for windows.  He doesn't want to have to manually create input card decs but would rather just enter coordinates for wires into a spreadsheet.  graphical representation of the input model,  the output E and H plane patterns, and element current distribution is desired.  If I can get this working we have a linux convert.
> >
> >How can I get nec2 working under debian with a decent pre and post processor?  The emphesis being on the input and output interface presentation and processing  (nec pre and post processing)
> >
> >TNX N 73 DE KG6KQT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Maybe Wine can do it. VMware can do it with an installed windows in it.
>
> 73 de Erik OZ4KK
>

maybe I was misunderstood.  I don't want to run windows software under linux.  I
want to get nec2 working natively and I'm looking for pre and post processors
that will allow him to avoid manually writing card decks and view output
graphicly.  all linux native.

73 de Eric kg6kqt

>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hams-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: