Re: Message from Rein

[Rein <rein@couperus.com>]

Yes, I am actually... 

During a contest I NEVER had time to do this type of edit with either CT or 
TRlog (cursor up, go where the error is, change it, get out.....). During 
such an operation you are ALWAYS called by XW9UJ or something, and you badly 
need this multiplier.

I prefer to make a note in the log (in tlf with ; and ENTER) and go on. This 
is much faster than editing, and you dont have to remember anything.

But IF I want to edit, I'd rather use my own editor.... (for joe: @, edit(in 
overwrite) ctrl-K w). You probably also have an editor you use in your sleep 
while dreaming, which is the same state of mind as being in the 44th hour of 
the CQWW....  :-)

Rein PA0RCT

P.S.: what editor would you like to use?


On Sunday 28 April 2002 16:22, Peter Lemken wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 02042811233900.02043@huey> you wrote:
> > 3.: "Edit last qso" now gets into the editor with the cursor on the last
> > line of the log (joe or vi, whichever you choose), which is the same
> > functionality CT or TRlog has (but not limited to the last 5 qso's).
>
> Err, are you serious? Editing a QSO with vi in a hectic contest. Boy, seems
> there are more masochist in here than I ever thought would be possible.
> What's next? A rig-control based on XEmacs? ;-)
>
> Peter Lemken
> DF5JT
> Berlin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hams-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org