Re: GNOME 3.8 in unstable?

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GNOME 3.8 in unstable?
From: Johannes Rohr <jorohr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:05:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] l01uuf$j76$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <7whaek9ftn.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <kn4hp7$hfh$1@ger.gmane.org> <5195F33E.1060901@debian.org> <7wwqoaaovc.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <51F5A480.9020409@debian.org> <7wbo5i8ayd.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <51FAE006.4070400@debian.org> <kv011c$42u$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130820203535.56469d94@piazzolla.home> <7whaek9ftn.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

Am 21.08.2013 00:07, schrieb Ben Finney:

Patrick Rudin <rudinp@solnet.ch> writes:

Johannes Rohr <jorohr@gmail.com> wrote:

I see that something has been moving, but I wonder wehn the 3.8
versions  evolution, gnome-shell, empathy etc. will make it into sid.

http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl12.html

I would guess in the next three days...

Thanks, Patrick. Is that the final transition holding GNOME 3.8 back?

Looking at the packages.qa.d.o pages for evolution, nautilus, empathyand gnome-shell, it doesn't look like there are any more pendingtransitions affecting these packages. I would thus really be verythankful to the developers if they could complete the upload of GNOME3.8 to unstable. For me, at least Evolution 3.4 seems to work verypoorly with the current mix of GNOME 3.4 and 3.8, however, filing bugsabout this seems to make little sense, as I would hope that they aretransient.

Or is there any principal reason not to update the remaining portions ofthe GNOME desktop in Debian?


Thanks,

Johannes

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNOME 3.8 in unstable?
  - From: Jean-Christophe Dubacq <jcdubacq1@free.fr>

Next by Date: Re: GNOME 3.8 in unstable?
Next by thread: Re: GNOME 3.8 in unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread