Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:23 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Apparently libeel's situation is a mess. Nautilus is depending on
> > libeel2-2 (not libeel2-2.16), which depends on the very same libeel2-
> > data than the others, but of course >= 2.16.
> Yeah; that was to be expected by the package name change; I don't feel
> like requesting bin NMUs for experimental as the release managers are
> overworked, and I don't feel like doing a binary rebuild of nautilus
> and others. This should fix itself with the next nautilus upload.
Ok. Back to hibernation mode then, patiently waiting for an installable